|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
September 25th, 2007, 17:37 | #1 |
Canadian rucksack
I'm just wondering if anyone can give me the model name/number or something to identify this pack... thanks
http://www.army.gc.ca/Chief_Land_Sta...ab/2/273_e.asp |
|
September 25th, 2007, 17:39 | #2 |
* AV Status REVOKED *
|
NSN – 8465-20-001-2864
Don't worry though, you'll probably never see this ruck since it's all but been binned.
__________________
|
September 25th, 2007, 18:01 | #3 | |
Ministry of Peace
|
Quote:
I only ask because; a) I was involved in the final trials on this item back in Feb (workup trg and a BFT). b) "In contracting" means "sourcing a manufacturer". Here in Kingston we have a shortage of the 82 pattern rucksack, as there are no more in the system to be had. This is a familiar pattern by now with kit that is being replaced, and generally means that within a year the new item should be avail. Same goes for gasmask carriers, being replaced so the old ones are not being made/ordered, hence shortage. |
|
September 25th, 2007, 18:28 | #4 |
yesss great news, I'm gunna be waiting for this sack, its awsome.
|
|
September 25th, 2007, 18:56 | #5 |
Actually no, it isn't. If you can find one, get your hands on a '64 pattern ruck. Best ruck ever.
__________________
"Anyone with a name like Amanishourbariki should give a few letters to the poor Ng family." - Snarfangel, Fark.com |
|
September 25th, 2007, 19:07 | #6 | |
* AV Status REVOKED *
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
September 25th, 2007, 19:28 | #7 |
One way or the other, I won't be holding my breath for it I'm happy enough with my patrol pack for now anyways.
|
|
September 25th, 2007, 20:13 | #8 | |
How many RF/Res actually use the patrol pack or the rucksack anyway? With all the high speed pack available in Cadpat TW these days, it would be interesting to know how many still use the issue stuff.
__________________
Ace of Spades © Copyright 2006 - Ace Of Spades. All Rights Reserved. Quote:
|
||
September 25th, 2007, 20:34 | #9 |
Even with nice day packs, you still need a ruck. Guys just customize the issued stuff with different sholder/waist straps or use a jump ruck.
__________________
Age Rep for Petawawa Area |
|
September 25th, 2007, 21:08 | #10 |
Ministry of Peace
|
Seen, it is taller, more like an alpine ruck - I wish I hadn't deleted the pics I took
|
October 2nd, 2007, 01:11 | #11 |
Don't knoick the small pack, its a nice bit of kit.
__________________
Maybe you'll find someone else to help you. Maybe black mesa... THAT WAS A JOKE, ha ha, fat chance. My Buy/Sell 1337ness rating |
|
October 22nd, 2007, 13:56 | #12 |
anymore on these sacks?
|
|
October 22nd, 2007, 16:23 | #13 |
I still use the rucksack. It sucks, but for the moment we are still using it. (N Sask R reservists), right now Im looking into getting the 64 ruck but no one below cpl has it..lol so..i dunno.
__________________
N Sask R Infantry Reservist Coming soon... Vltor + 553+Surefire = win |
|
October 22nd, 2007, 16:55 | #14 |
A Total Bastard
|
I have the 64 and the 82 and WAY prefer the 82 for a big (80+) loads.
If it doesn't have a fucking metal frame it shouldn't be called a ruck. Just looking at the 2864 gives me shivers. It's already tall, where the fuck are you supposed to tack on your bag and air mattress? Put those on the bottom and the damn thing will be 5 feet tall
__________________
VINCITE OMNIMODO
|
October 22nd, 2007, 17:20 | #15 |
Ministry of Peace
|
The sleeping bag system goes in the bottom section (it's a compressable stuff-sack like portion built in); as for the thermarest no idea.But since I still use the 'ole "rubber woman" I suppose I'd just fold it and put it in the stuffsack portion first.
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|