|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
July 8th, 2009, 15:59 | #1 |
This isn't off-topic anymore! (was: Have YOU got a metal lathe and know how to use it?)
I have a specific need for a relatively simple yet precise couple pieces of brass (or aluminum, or steel... but prefer brass).
If anyone has a lathe and can turn it out, I'd be interested in talking to you about it.
If you can bang out this sort of thing and mail it to me, fire me a PM and I'll send you the additional details. I only need one. The sooner the better. If it works out, the rest of you will find out what it's for soon enough. if it doesn't, well then it goes into the "failures" bin and no one hears about it ever again. :lol: Last edited by DonP; July 31st, 2009 at 12:07.. Reason: This isn't off-topic anymore! |
|
July 8th, 2009, 16:12 | #2 |
Tys
|
Why yes...I do. Just a little hobby thing.
So 6.01-6.03 is the max diameter? I think my through spindle can handle that. The shorter the better obviously...but I can try. Send me a pm with the specifics...or call. I have time this weekend. It's either repairs, working on one of my projects or this. Tys |
July 8th, 2009, 17:10 | #3 |
Well, that was fast.
|
|
July 8th, 2009, 17:47 | #4 |
Admits to killing Jimmy Hoffa
|
|
July 8th, 2009, 23:55 | #5 |
PM sent.
|
|
July 9th, 2009, 00:05 | #6 |
Delierious Designer of Dastardly Detonations
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in the dark recesses of some metal chip filled machine shop
|
5"-6" is too long to do in one setup. Since the middle diameter can be smaller, it would be easy to start with 1/4" rod and turn one end to your accurate 6.03mm diameter. Turn the rod around and work the other end so both ends would be fairly coaxial. Work the midsection in 1cm lengths sticking out of the headstock and step it along. Turn the last bit before the inside end (without chucking on that end, which might mar the end) and finish the midsection. I'm guessing it doesn't matter if the midsection is coaxial with the ends, but coaxiality at the two ends is important. Doing those ends on the as rolled bar (assuming that the bar is decently straight and round) before cutting the midsection would be more coaxial before you start cutting it down.
I think I may have 1/4" bar for you Tys if you take the job.
__________________
Want nearly free GBB gas? |
July 9th, 2009, 00:14 | #7 |
Tys
|
I'm sure Carl's lathe is hooked directly to his brain and he'd have it finished by the time I finish writing this post.
Don and I traded PM's, I've got some spare bits that I think will work. Gives me an excellent excuse to retreat to the workshop Sat morning with a hot cup of coffee. Feel free to give'er a go...I quite often fail miserably. getting the hang of it...my little steam engine is coming along nicely (2nd attempt!). |
July 9th, 2009, 01:40 | #8 | |
Quote:
Cut the bar long, turn a chucking seat. Then flip it and use the c'sunk end for the tail stock. Turn the whole shebang in one shot. Edit: never mind, for some reason I ignored the part about being brass. Forget that noise, I hate brass and doubt we have any. |
||
July 9th, 2009, 01:44 | #9 |
Delierious Designer of Dastardly Detonations
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in the dark recesses of some metal chip filled machine shop
|
I mean that 6" is too long for a 1/4" dia which would be quite flexible. Unless you use a follow rest, you'd probably get some chatter.
Why do you hate brass? It machines like buttah. DonP: if you're putting this part inside a barrel, try not to slide it around too much in a brass one. Brass has an annoying habit of sticking to itself and trading atoms. As a rule of thumb, I try not to slide like materials against each other with the exception of hardened steels.
__________________
Want nearly free GBB gas? Last edited by MadMax; July 9th, 2009 at 01:46.. |
July 9th, 2009, 02:02 | #10 |
Huh, learn something new every day. Well, thankfully this is just for a test-of-concept so no long-term durability requirement here. :P
|
|
July 9th, 2009, 03:19 | #11 |
July 9th, 2009, 03:27 | #12 | |
Delierious Designer of Dastardly Detonations
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in the dark recesses of some metal chip filled machine shop
|
Quote:
I've gotten MUCH better wear from bronze or engineering plastics like acetal (POM) or nylon. Still, the stiffness and machinibility of brass makes for good short term prototyping mat'l.
__________________
Want nearly free GBB gas? |
|
July 9th, 2009, 07:30 | #13 |
If you want more wear resistance go for something like aluminum-nickel-bronze or copper-nickel-tin (Toughmet). You could use heat treated copper-beryllium but the machining dust is poisonous in large amounts.
I know a couple of guys with Swiss CNC's that would bang something like that out in a heartbeat. |
|
July 12th, 2009, 20:16 | #14 |
Tys
|
Not bad for a first try. Hopefully good enough for prototyping. (I've got to take some photography courses....)
|
July 12th, 2009, 20:40 | #15 | |
GabeGuitarded
|
Ze plot, she thickens.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|