|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
April 22nd, 2009, 00:04 | #1 |
sig 55_'s
besides barrel length what is the difference between the sig 552, 551, 550?
|
|
April 22nd, 2009, 00:09 | #2 |
in airsoft? not much. the original (and rare) TM 550 i thought had a 3 round burst feature, but i could be mistaken.
|
|
April 22nd, 2009, 00:12 | #3 |
April 22nd, 2009, 01:12 | #4 |
The Tm 550 did have a 3rd burst function. it takes a stick battery, as far as I know, in the hand grip.
|
|
April 22nd, 2009, 01:58 | #5 |
SIG 550 - Built-in bipods in the handguard. 534mm inner barrel, and quite a long weapon. Very nice for a 400-450 FPS semi-sniper.
SIG 551 - Shorter version of the 550. Although I haven't really checked too closely, I think all airsoft versions are replicas of the SG551-SB (Short Barrel) also known as the SWAT-version of the 551 in the realsteel community. It has a 363mm inner barrel and a handguard similar in design to the 550, just shorter. SIG 552 - Short, sexy and mostly for CQB as it can get less precise over long distances. This is of course depending on what equip you get for improving accuracy (recommending Guarder clear hop-up, H-nub and a precision barrel). It has a 247mm inner barrel and a slighy different handguard design, mostly due to it's short length. In my opinion the best looking of them all! The holes in the handguard really makes it stand out. The 552 can only take mini-size 8.4V conventional batteries, or a mini-type lipo, if you make some minor modifications to the gun. A least the TM 550, and ICS 551 use stick type batteries, maybe also the TM 551. From what I've read, both the 550 and the 551 from TM has burst, but this info is only semi-confirmed. The 552 most certainly has not burst, but rather the more common full auto. Jing gong make some good and cheap clones of the TM 550 and 552. For the most the JG has better internals than the TM, better meaning that the gears are stronger, reinforced gearbox etc.
__________________
"Everything will be OK in the end. If it's not OK, it's not the end." Last edited by Corleone; April 22nd, 2009 at 02:03.. |
|
April 22nd, 2009, 02:37 | #6 |
__________________
|
|
April 22nd, 2009, 18:41 | #7 |
Internally, apart from barrel length, there is no difference. Externally the difference is obvious. I recommend the JG 550... beautiful piece of weaponry. Just throw a metal body on it and you're golden. That's expensive though, and its not for everyone. The stock plastic body is fine and will hold up well enough.
__________________
Not for glory, nor riches, nor honours, but for freedom alone, which no good man gives up except with his life. |
|
April 22nd, 2009, 21:39 | #8 |
I heard that the TM 550 and 551 have an electrical bust function, that can fry if you use high voltage batteries. Not 100% confirmed info though! The JG 550 supposedly only has full auto, and not the burst function.
__________________
"Everything will be OK in the end. If it's not OK, it's not the end." |
|
April 23rd, 2009, 01:02 | #9 |
You can't find very many original TM 550s these days. They're hard to find. They had a burst function that was adjustable, and wasn't very good. And they did tend to fry out over time.
__________________
Not for glory, nor riches, nor honours, but for freedom alone, which no good man gives up except with his life. |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|