|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
| Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
March 7th, 2009, 16:42
|
#1 |
|
G&G Scar L Tan - Reality check
Hi,
Reality check: is it me or the tan finish on the G&G Scar L Tan is off versus the real version? G&G:   Real:  
__________________
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 16:44
|
#2 |
|
Could be lighting !
__________________
Weapons : 39 airsoft weapons. Daf YA 314, 3 ton Dutch Army Truck. Retired Reg.Force 1 Brigade RECCE. nmvac.org |
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 16:53
|
#3 |
|
In his Trunk!
|
Naw... the G+G looks pretty coppery... like a shiny new penny.
and there's a red tip on it too 
__________________
"War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend: the city of the Men of Numenor, and I would have her loved for her memory, her ancientry, her beauty, and her present wisdom. Not feared, save as men may fear the dignity of a man, old and wise." - J.R.R. Tolkien |
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 17:24
|
#4 |
|
Le Roi des poissons d'avril
|
What's with the GI with the speeding BB logo on it?
Watermark or on the actual rifle?
__________________
 Vérificateur d'âge: Terrebonne |
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 17:25
|
#5 |
|
yes, the camera setting and lighting condition when the photo was taken makes a HUGE difference in colour and tone. So don't believe those pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 17:26
|
#6 | |
|
|
Quote:
On WGC site, the finish seems off also: 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 17:29
|
#7 |
|
|
believe me man, the "real" SCAR photos doesn't seem to have any lighting at all. On the other hand, pictures taken for retail purposes are always taken in Studios with LOTS AND LOTS of lights.
|
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 17:54
|
#8 |
|
IMO no airsoft company has made a correct coloured SCAR, since all companies mold their lower receivers in tan plastic and their uppers in aluminum they never have matching upper and lower colours. The closest one their is is probably the Classic Army one but that to is off by a bit.
YouTube - AATV Video Review: Scar vs. Scar vs. Scar vs. Scar The Dboys one's upper receiver is bronze as opposed to tan.
__________________
"Don't you know the first law of physics? Anything fun costs atleast $8" 
Last edited by sushicake; March 7th, 2009 at 17:58.. |
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 18:04
|
#9 |
|
That gun looks the way a turd covered in burnt hair would smell anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 18:23
|
#10 | |
|
|
Quote:
__________________
"Don't you know the first law of physics? Anything fun costs atleast $8"
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2009, 22:41
|
#11 |
|
Prancercise Guru
|
Doesn't the real Mark 16 have a polymer lower receiver? I count about 5 tans in the FN pictures.
As said before the way they colour corrected the pics will exagerate the differences in materials. It's like expecting cotton and nylon too look the same. |
|
|
|
|
March 8th, 2009, 09:03
|
#12 |
|
colour differences are due to the classic armys having a painted upper and other makes like g&g/dboys being anodized resulting in a metallic effect
__________________
ca scar/icsm4/galaxy mp7/agm m14/ ca sa58/g&g l85/ca mp5/tm m4/ca g3/g&g ak104/maruzen m11cqb/g&g sr25/ca m4a1/top m249/ a&k masada/tmp90/jg552 seals/tm m16a1/tm uzi/l96/star l1a1/de m56/dboy kac pdw/jg g36c/a&k druganov/tm mc51/m93r aep/glock aep/tm thompson/agm mp40/hexagon ppsh41/dboy k98 wood |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
|
