Wich one to choose VFC or GG top tech Hk 416

[PROTECTION2]

Iam in need of an new Aeg ive choosen the model wasnt easy iam going with the hk416 ou M27 however iam confuse between the GG top tech or the Umarex made by Vfc both seem awsome but iam looking for great fps and precision and long range for about 200f straight out of the box if needed i will change the innerbarrel for an tightbore barrel but rather have it straight out the box .... what you guys thinks there is also a good price difference the gg is 375$ and the VFC at 590$....

the GG :http://aventureairsoftlanaudiere.com...416-full-metal

the VFC : http://www.torontoairsoft.com/UMAREX...FC_p_3863.html

thank you i speak french also

[KenTsui]

I don't think you'll be getting 200' out of the box with either of these. I can't speak for G&G but I own the VFC HK416.

The VFC has really nice external quality. The internals are average. I don't know anything about the G&G, but the price difference might give you the money you need to improve its performance to your expectations.

[Stealth]

I almost exclusively run VFC rifles now. I find VFC internals to be substantially above average if anything...

[Hectic]

the vfc is agrueably the nicest l, most accurate looking 416 out there. Throw a flat, bridge or rhop and a quality inner barrel in it, some good quality .30 bb's and yer golden

[BioRage]

Vfc ftw.

[brock0]

I've owned G&G, G&P, and VFC guns. While not specifically the 416, have been most pleased with VFC.

I don't think you can go wrong with a VFC.

$620 with tax tho... ouch. There are some brand new VFC guns for sale in the trade section

[BioRage]

Also G&G is mostly plastic, so....

[PROTECTION2]

Originally Posted by BioRage

Also G&G is mostly plastic, so....

the gg is the top tech full metal version ... i already have an GG Max m4 cqb so ont the fiel gosh i loose precision ....

[Wilkie]

Ya, not much plastic on a top tech

[Chromey]

I don't own any VFC, But my 4 G@G top tech guns have all been Flawless since the day I bought them.

200' out of the Box, I don't think either would do this.

[mr_nuts31]

I say go for the VFC 416 mainly because the quality of VFC AEG speak for themselves. But there is only one problem which might make you go towards the G&G version and that`s magazine compatibility. Basically, the real steel 416 is actually somewhat picky with magazines and VFC replicates it to a T. But don`t let that discourage you, it`s a very easy fix.

[EchoFourTwelve]

I would highly recommend a VFC. G&G is great on a budget but VFC IS DAMN SWEET

[PROTECTION2]

Originally Posted by mr_nuts31

I say go for the VFC 416 mainly because the quality of VFC AEG speak for themselves. But there is only one problem which might make you go towards the G&G version and that`s magazine compatibility. Basically, the real steel 416 is actually somewhat picky with magazines and VFC replicates it to a T. But don`t let that discourage you, it`s a very easy fix.

Iam only using king arms metal m4 mags fo you think they will fit in the vfc hk ?

[Zack The Ripper]

G&G makes their products slightly off spec making many of their bodies somewhat proprietary in the sense that many RIS units and magazines don't fit correctly.

VFC for the win. Best AEG brand you can buy.

[Darklen]

Originally Posted by BioRage

Also G&G is mostly plastic, so....

Only the entry level Combat Machine line is plastic. It's actually a quite strong polymer. The Top Tech line is metal.

The G&G T4-18 isn't accurate to an actual 416 as they don't have the license rights. G&G have been very cautious about the licensing thing the past few years. That's why you don't see many G&G FN guns here. They don't have the license rights for Canada for most of them.

If you don't care about how accurate it looks, G&G are great performers. While VFC have incredibly good externals, I think their internals could be better considering their cost. Even overseas, they're expensive. I'm not saying they're bad, not in the slightest. Just that for the price, you should get better internals.