Inokatsu 2011 Armalite line up

[Sim123456]

Most impressive AR I can think off. Look bad ass. Price also looks bad ass lol 1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. Personnaly if I could I would but I can't so I wont.

[Shatter]

Just when you thought your wallet was safe...

[Sim123456]

Ya, the problem in life is that there's always something better, cooler, greater... and more expensive!

[kullwarrior]

Don't want, they still didn't fix that ugly forge mold seam....look at 2nd picture at the magwell.

[T@NK]

Don't want, rather save money for the RS GBBR.

[Sim123456]

Ya, the infamous mold seam lol I still didn't decided if in, globaly, affect the quality of gun. For me, a forged receiver, even with a mold seam, is better then a die-cast receiver without it.

By the, I notice that my new VFC M4A1 GBBR has also this mold seam, but it's thinnier.

[dracu]

1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. $2000 for upgrades and repairs to make it reliable, but its ok its only $6.00 for tylenol for your headache. lol.

[SteelToe]

Originally Posted by dracu

1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. $2000 for upgrades and repairs to make it reliable, but its ok its only $6.00 for tylenol for your headache. lol.

This was just out. Whats wrong with it that its not reliable?

Anyone sell this in Canada?

[Dynamo]

Originally Posted by dracu

1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. $2000 for upgrades and repairs in an attempt to make it reliable, but its ok its only $6.00 for tylenol for your headache. lol.

^fixed

the bolt retention design is the same as all the other failed attempts.. no thanks.

can anyone say "Reduce, Reuse and Recycle"..

it's like a reoccurring nightmare.
manufacturer releases new gun, claims to be new and improved. design is unchanged, so the same issues from the first gen WAs are still there. the sheeple got nuts, claim that this time they have fixed the problems and chew out anyone who criticizes their purchase. page after page of new topics pop up in the trouble shooting section of forums around the world, with the same complaints from two years ago. 3rd party manufacturer re-releases so called "improved parts" to fix the known issues, which fix nothing. more new posts in the trouble shooting section. apologetics blame the users for their problems, and think that replacing most of the internals every few weeks is normal and part of the design.

rinse, repeat... pathetic.

waiting on the next release. not expecting any change.

[SteelToe]

Originally Posted by Dynamo

^fixed

the bolt retention design is the same as all the other failed attempts.. no thanks.

can anyone say "Reduce, Reuse and Recycle"..

it's like a reoccurring nightmare.
manufacturer releases new gun, claims to be new and improved. design is unchanged, so the same issues from the first gen WAs are still there. the sheeple got nuts, claim that this time they have fixed the problems and chew out anyone who criticizes their purchase. page after page of new topics pop up in the trouble shooting section of forums around the world, with the same complaints from two years ago. 3rd party manufacturer re-releases so called "improved parts" to fix the known issues, which fix nothing. more new posts in the trouble shooting section. apologetics blame the users for their problems, and think that replacing most of the internals every few weeks is normal and part of the design.

rinse, repeat... pathetic.

waiting on the next release. not expecting any change.

So youre talking about WA. What about Inokatsu? The same problems? I dont see any Ino thread listing its problems. Im trying to understand.

[Dynamo]

Originally Posted by ExtraExtra

So youre talking about WA. What about Inokatsu? The same problems? I dont see any Ino thread listing its problems. Im trying to understand.

Inukatsu is a WA based system, if you don't know that, you know nothing about the WA system. the only real difference is in the length of the carrier (in this case Inu's carrier comes at WA length standard, and they include a spacer/weight for use in Inu/Prime receivers), everything else is practically identical.

i care not what materials they use, if the engineering behind the system is bad, the product will fail.

[Kid]

Well, I like it, but the price is extremely high.

I wish they would stop releasing their guns with RIS systems by default. I'd prefer high quality handguards.

Anyway... I'm with T@NK. I'll wait for the RealSword. Will be cheaper and should be better.

[Sim123456]

I wish they would stop releasing their guns with RIS systems by default. I'd prefer high quality handguards

I think exactly the samething! I need real handguard.

But by the, except the WE close chamber, for now, you can only goes with th WA design because, well, there's nothing else ^^

[SteelToe]

Originally Posted by Dynamo

Inukatsu is a WA based system, if you don't know that, you know nothing about the WA system. the only real difference is in the length of the carrier (in this case Inu's carrier comes at WA length standard, and they include a spacer/weight for use in Inu/Prime receivers), everything else is practically identical.

i care not what materials they use, if the engineering behind the system is bad, the product will fail.

Ino is WA based. Roger that.

So the brand/config that seems to be better is WE's open bolt system. It went through a real life exercise earlier as reported by Brian.

[hattrick]

Originally Posted by ExtraExtra

Ino is WA based. Roger that.

So the brand/config that seems to be better is WE's open bolt system. It went through a real life exercise earlier as reported by Brian.

That was the closed bolt system.