|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
July 28th, 2007, 17:18 | #1 |
TM M733
What are your opinions on the Tokyo Marui M733 Commando?
From what I've seen (I want to buy it) it performs good, looks good, and doesn't have that wobble. Any of you guys own one? |
|
July 28th, 2007, 18:49 | #2 |
well i have owned a tm m733 for almost a year now, great gun nice and compact, iv only had one problem with it and that was the thing stopping barrel wobble snaped, was most likly my fault and not a fault in the gun
at any case it is still working just needs a bit o tape :S |
|
July 28th, 2007, 20:44 | #3 |
aka Halo64
|
im going to get it unsted of the TM M4A1 and just get a M4 barrel and Stock i say it is a better gun anyways. My cousin just got it and i may buy 1 to what do you think should i
|
July 28th, 2007, 22:53 | #4 |
meh i dont see why ud get the m4 barrel, a few extra inchs>??
compensating for something???? |
|
July 29th, 2007, 01:01 | #5 |
aka Halo64
|
it looks cooler then a short barrel if i dont get the barrel i will get a tactical Stock instead
and im hoping to order it soon need $130 more after i get all me money from my BirthDay Tomorrow i save my working money for other things so can use that Last edited by HaloSix4; July 29th, 2007 at 01:04.. |
July 29th, 2007, 03:10 | #6 | |
Just for reference, and RIS/RAS that requires a front sight collar to mount will NOT fit an M733. You either have to get an M4/CQB length outer barrel, or a 733-specific RAS/RIS system.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
July 29th, 2007, 03:47 | #7 |
E-01
|
I owned one briefly. It's not bad if you plan on using it as a small stock CQB gun, but if your goal is to start dropping parts into it or accessorizing, I'd suggest you base it off the M4 as it'll be easier to match parts and the M4 has a flattop receiver for mounting optics.
You can throw on a one piece barrel fairly cheap (either a 14.5" M4 length one, or a 11.5" M733 length one, or even a 10.5") and in the end it's just less headaches.
__________________
|
July 29th, 2007, 11:39 | #8 |
What is the accuracy and range like on it? I know it shoots roughly 284-85 fps, but is it accurate?
|
|
July 29th, 2007, 23:40 | #9 |
aka Halo64
|
ok ill stay with the TM M4A1
|
July 30th, 2007, 00:52 | #10 | |
I have mine running at 330 fps with a tightbore barrel and I don't think I give away much (if anything) to more upgraded guns.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
July 30th, 2007, 02:27 | #11 |
Mine's shooting about 350 fps. Lightly upgraded spring, metal bushings, tightbore M4 length barrel, and a new airnozzle and its wicked and can compete with most other upgraded guns no problem. The tightbore really made a difference....... seems like it boosted the FPS and accuracy aswell as a bit of range.
Goes to show you dont really need to throw down like $500 to upgrade a gun when really if you do the math and plan your upgrades lightly and match parts correctly you can get some damn good performance for alot cheaper. I personally like this gun alot, but then again everyone has there own opinions... But I think its great Perfect balance for anyone. One complaint is it doesnt have the flattop like the M4 which would make it quite a bit nicer but I just threw on a Carryhandle rail and an Aimpoint and its just a good
__________________
Happiness comes from belt fed weapons! -------------------------- SIR - South Island Rangers |
|
July 30th, 2007, 09:37 | #12 | |
Just a point of note: When I did this, I found you lose a decent cheek weld on the stock, as the scope sits high above where your eye would normally line up with proper cheek weld on the stock. I have a G&P Aimpoint clone on a low mount, attached to a real-steel carry-handle mount, and I can't even put my cheek on the stock, I have to lift my head way up. The difference in height makes it almost impossible to co-witness the sights to the RDS (if you wanted too).
__________________
Quote:
|
||
July 31st, 2007, 13:04 | #13 | |
Quote:
That is True. When using the regular Iron sites you can keep your cheek rested on the stock and gives you a more comfortable support, where as with the aimpoint mounted so high on the carry handle you literally have to lift your head off your stock and hold it supported by nothing really and can give you a pretty good neck kramp after a good days worth of playing PS. Skruface I love your damn signature man.... Just noticed it and it cracked me up!
__________________
Happiness comes from belt fed weapons! -------------------------- SIR - South Island Rangers Last edited by Brodie_BHD; July 31st, 2007 at 13:12.. |
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|