|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
| Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
June 10th, 2014, 11:15
|
#16 |
|
Ick, the original Slab Sides is at least serviceable. Imagine the holster you need for this beast? The draw time!
Who cares if it's almost recoiless if you can't point it in time, lol?
__________________
|
|
|
|
June 10th, 2014, 11:19
|
#17 |
|
How much sand CAN you fit in your vagina!?
|
I guess it would depend on exactly how much recoil it all reduces. The Beretta PX4 has a rotating inner barrel to cut down on recoil, and a small counter weight in the front. People complain about that gun being front heavy, this looks much heavier. In this day and age though a gun should look good really, there's no excuse for it not to. As far as airsoft is concerned, if it performs ridiculously well, people with use it regardless. I'm sure later models will include a light/laser com or something.
__________________
I have developed a new sport called Airhard. Pretty much the same as Airsoft, except you have to maintain an erection... |
|
|
|
|
June 10th, 2014, 16:28
|
#18 |
|
|
Haha, I don't mean to disagree, but no. The amount of recoil doesn't increase its worth over carry-ability.
If it's too big or heavy to remove quickly, then it's a very expensive paperweight. After all, unweighted and uncompensated guns have been around a looooong time, but prove themselves in the draw. A compensator would be better, but I think we're mostly missing the fact that the added bulk at the muzzle of this new wondergun isn't for weight, but to contain the recoil-reducing mechanisms. Versus weight and bulk, give me a comp any day.
__________________
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
|
