|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
August 24th, 2005, 11:21 | #1 |
Moving_target
|
M-16A2 with M203
M-16A2 with M203
Calling all grenadiers!!! Need Help in decision making Say hello to my little friend I will get an M16A2 tomorrow and I am looking to make an M-16A2 like this. [IMG] I want this to be • The most realistic as possible • Full metal • Best performance, quality The last thing I worried is the price After looking and reading in this forum on the net and Asian store on-line I cam to these option Here or my options 1. Sun Project M203 Grenade Launcher http://www.tokyo-model.com.hk/trade/productview/1212 2. Or pick out a full metal grenade launcher G&P M203 Upper Handguard (Long)(BK) http://www.tokyo-model.com.hk/trade/productview/3199 3. ARLL M203 Model Kit (Shoot Version http://www.tokyo-model.com.hk/imagec...view/1599/130/ And what the hell is this The fact his kit is plastic doesn’t really appeal to me but the fact that is the first time that thing that usually goes on the carry handle is really interesting I would really appreciate feed back because I am at the buying stage and I am blocked. Thanks in Advance |
August 24th, 2005, 11:41 | #2 |
I would go with the Sun Project M203. Although, are you sure you want to spend that much money a grenade launcher? With that money I'd rather get a scope, and bipod to be a rifleman or gunner. ;-) Your decision.
|
|
August 24th, 2005, 14:26 | #3 |
Moving_target
|
I am sure, this is what i want
|
August 24th, 2005, 15:11 | #4 |
Sun Project.
Forget the model Kit, it's good as a cheap battery holder for M4's and thats it. If you try to use it as a launcher it'll be busted in a day. IF YOU USE A METAL M203, you HAVE to get a metal body and reinforced outter barrel, or devise a way to augment the stock barrel mount to carry the extra weight. I've done two of these guns, the first had no reinforced barrel and suffered extreem accuracy/range degration after just a week. The second was completely metal and never degraded.
__________________
When the going gets tough... the tough go cyclic. |
|
August 24th, 2005, 16:34 | #5 | |
Guessing by the fact he said money isn't really a concern, I'm thinking metal body for grenade launcher would = metal body for rifle.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
August 24th, 2005, 17:28 | #6 |
grenade launchers are only really good for indoor CQB.
|
|
August 24th, 2005, 18:16 | #7 | |
Moving_target
|
Quote:
|
|
August 24th, 2005, 20:23 | #8 | |
Quote:
__________________
When the going gets tough... the tough go cyclic. |
||
August 25th, 2005, 12:22 | #9 |
I can recommend G&P M203 Military Version + G&P handguard. I have it mounted on CA M15A2 rifle and although some slight modification to launcher mounts was required, it is rock solid. If money is no concern to you, get G&P quadrant sight and you will get nice complete set :-)
See http://www.wargames.sk/modules/coppe...2/Dsc00055.jpg :xmas: |
|
August 25th, 2005, 17:37 | #10 |
The G&P is metal, although it doesnt come with the vented hand guard. And it has a much better finnish then the SP.
__________________
“The police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.” - Sir Robert Peel |
|
August 26th, 2005, 09:20 | #11 |
Moving_target
|
Well thanks to everyone I made up what I wanted...
Thanks **[l33t+lil'ramZ]**,Sgt_Lynch,firemachine69,attack-beacer,tomaash, gallantcorey, and Brian I went with the option 2 and orded.... Thanks again guys JF |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|