|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
March 12th, 2011, 14:26 | #16 | |
Crackers
|
Quote:
closed bolt = reliability and at 1300$ I'll wait for a RS gbbr or a reliable full size AK |
|
March 12th, 2011, 14:50 | #17 | |
8=======D
|
Quote:
of course it depends on why you buy the guns. For me it's about performance and effective simulation of the real firearm for training purposes. For others its about sitting in their basement in their underwear racking the bolt while a little bit of spittle leaks out of the corner of their mouths.
__________________
Brian McIlmoyle TTAC3 Director CAPS Range Officer Toronto Downtown Age Verifier OPERATION WOODSMAN If the tongue could cut as the sword does, the dead would be infinite |
|
March 12th, 2011, 15:23 | #18 |
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
|
Although it looks pretty.. The only one I am interested in checking out/owning besides the WETTI would be the real sword m4 GBBR (As previously stated in this thread)... whenever they release that is! This is mainly due to the quality of the upper/lower I've been hearing so much about.
As it stands, WETTI's seem to be quite the work horse, and that's really what draws me towards the platform. F*ck it, maybe I'll just try and get both. Last edited by c3sk; March 12th, 2011 at 15:26.. |
March 12th, 2011, 15:32 | #19 | |
NAAZ's #1 fan!
|
Quote:
What brings you to this conclusion? edit / thread jack -alex |
|
March 12th, 2011, 15:50 | #20 |
Iskaryot
|
Save up for the QBU-88 that's coming out ;D
__________________
|
March 12th, 2011, 16:15 | #21 | |
Quote:
More moving parts = more parts to break Still won't bite the closed nozzle system. It's not my taste, I like crisp cycling (WE closed chamber seem to be like sluggish) |
||
March 12th, 2011, 16:24 | #22 | |
formerly Sepulcrum
|
Quote:
Back on topic though: Inu's are not worth the money when the much more reliable WEs are so much cheaper. |
|
March 12th, 2011, 16:37 | #23 | |
8=======D
|
Quote:
airsofters complain about reliability.. but still want "cool" ,LE\MIL want robust reliable training tools
__________________
Brian McIlmoyle TTAC3 Director CAPS Range Officer Toronto Downtown Age Verifier OPERATION WOODSMAN If the tongue could cut as the sword does, the dead would be infinite |
|
March 12th, 2011, 17:49 | #24 |
I agree with the comments on the WETTI closed bolt system. The only two problems I have had, is I did not add enough oil to the propane to keep the bolt functioning smoothly, obvious user fault, and the pin holding the roller on the hammer came loose, user fault as I did not catch it by closely inspecting each part. Even with those two malfunctions, the weapon was still functioning, not as smoothly, but still functioning.
From what I have read about the WA based systems, parts wearing out quickly for one example, as well as constant attention to the weapon to keep it runing some of the time? I don't think I would bother with that. I want a reliable system that will keep working regardless of exposure to the elements, and physical abuse, this goes the same with the magazines as well. So far my WE has not let me down due to design, but due to operator error, that was later rectified and learned from.
__________________
|
|
March 12th, 2011, 18:12 | #25 | ||
ASC's Whiny Bitch
|
Quote:
Bastards + basic maintenance + WE (rifle) = fucking Jesus gun Also, I like my closed bolt, sometimes you get a flash of the brass colour, kinda like a shell ejecting :P
__________________
Quote:
Certified Level 3.1415926 Orbital Weapons platform Certified |
||
March 12th, 2011, 20:18 | #26 | |
Quote:
__________________
|
||
March 12th, 2011, 21:34 | #27 |
Guys can we get back to topic? This is become another WE system bashing at KJ and WA.
Seriously people aren't going to change their side, suck it up. |
|
March 12th, 2011, 22:03 | #28 |
Yes you are absolutely right, let's get back on topic.
__________________
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|