|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
| Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
April 29th, 2010, 13:55
|
#1 |
|
CA verus TM, MP5K
Hi,
Was wondering: what would you take between a MP5K from TM and one from CA (Sportline serie)? Thanks
__________________
|
|
|
|
April 29th, 2010, 14:08
|
#2 | ||
|
* KNOWN LIAR *
|
The CA sportline is crap so the TM is better but the CA proline is better then the TM
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
April 29th, 2010, 14:42
|
#3 |
|
Likes it BOLD attention whore MAXIMUS!
|
Thats an easy one bro..
TM = Solid reliability out of the box (ABS body, TM solid internals) CA = Guaranteed to reliably fail out of the box within 6 months. (Metal boy, CA dog shit internals) |
|
|
|
|
April 29th, 2010, 16:25
|
#4 |
|
I have never used a CA but my TM is like an energizer bunny.
I took it apart last winter because I thought 50-100 thousand cycles would wear down the internals. Everything was like new inside the mechbox. The plastic bushings were even perfect. That's reliability. |
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
|
