|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
January 21st, 2006, 13:33 | #16 |
So, G&Gs aren't bad is what I am to understand. And new CAs are good? Thank you.
__________________
Can you supersize ambition? Would that make you ambitious if you wanted to supersize ambition? |
|
January 21st, 2006, 13:43 | #17 |
yees, new CA are good, but, old G&G are bad too
|
|
January 23rd, 2006, 07:14 | #18 |
The UMP, for example, kick ass. When you get it though, take the whole thing apart and regrease the mechbox with proper silicone grease. If you know how.
__________________
...and she's terribly partial to the periwinkle blue. |
|
January 23rd, 2006, 09:32 | #19 |
Guest
|
G&G and G&P full metal, high quality
almost anything else is gonna cost hundreds to make full metal in the end, if you go for a CA, your gonna invent a lot more into the gun to get it to par with G&P |
January 23rd, 2006, 11:13 | #20 |
G&G isn't so bad if you don't mind having funny trades. The construction is quite solid and hardly worry about being too hard on my GR16. Right out of the box the hop-up needed to be addressed. I just replaced the sleeve and bucking with TM and it was good to go. ROF on 8.4 isn't all that great, but realistic. I don't full auto much anyways.
Depending on retailers if you buy a Gen 1 gun, it'll come with a new mech box. Gen 2's should have the newer mechbox already installed. Don't quote me on that though. I believe the theory behind the nex box was to make it more compatible with TM and aftermarket parts. |
|
January 23rd, 2006, 13:34 | #21 |
formerly pivot
|
I have 2 G&G's and they both work great after shelling out $15 for 2 new hop up buckings.
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|