Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   G&G Scar L Tan - Reality check (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=78126)

Long_Bong March 7th, 2009 15:42

G&G Scar L Tan - Reality check
 
Hi,

Reality check: is it me or the tan finish on the G&G Scar L Tan is off versus the real version?

G&G:

http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...crLcqctamG.jpg

http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...crLcqctamB.jpg

Real:

http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...scar-l_all.jpg

http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...L_Standard.jpg

Brit ter March 7th, 2009 15:44

Could be lighting !

Gunk March 7th, 2009 15:53

Naw... the G+G looks pretty coppery... like a shiny new penny.

and there's a red tip on it too ;)

FOX_111 March 7th, 2009 16:24

What's with the GI with the speeding BB logo on it?

Watermark or on the actual rifle?

Skladfin March 7th, 2009 16:25

yes, the camera setting and lighting condition when the photo was taken makes a HUGE difference in colour and tone. So don't believe those pictures.

Long_Bong March 7th, 2009 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by FOX_111 (Post 934805)
What's with the GI with the speeding BB logo on it?

Watermark or on the actual rifle?

Watermark for airsoft GI web site,

On WGC site, the finish seems off also:

http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...crcqctan_l.jpg

Skladfin March 7th, 2009 16:29

believe me man, the "real" SCAR photos doesn't seem to have any lighting at all. On the other hand, pictures taken for retail purposes are always taken in Studios with LOTS AND LOTS of lights.

sushicake March 7th, 2009 16:54

IMO no airsoft company has made a correct coloured SCAR, since all companies mold their lower receivers in tan plastic and their uppers in aluminum they never have matching upper and lower colours. The closest one their is is probably the Classic Army one but that to is off by a bit.

YouTube - AATV Video Review: Scar vs. Scar vs. Scar vs. Scar

The Dboys one's upper receiver is bronze as opposed to tan.

Rumpel Felt March 7th, 2009 17:04

That gun looks the way a turd covered in burnt hair would smell anyway.

sushicake March 7th, 2009 17:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rumpel Felt (Post 934828)
That gun looks the way a turd covered in burnt hair would smell anyway.

well the smell goes away eventually, and IMO you have one of the best and most economically friendly SCAR on the market.

Danke March 7th, 2009 21:41

Doesn't the real Mark 16 have a polymer lower receiver? I count about 5 tans in the FN pictures.

As said before the way they colour corrected the pics will exagerate the differences in materials.

It's like expecting cotton and nylon too look the same.

screwdriver March 8th, 2009 08:03

colour differences are due to the classic armys having a painted upper and other makes like g&g/dboys being anodized resulting in a metallic effect


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.