|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
May 31st, 2011, 18:04 | #1 |
FPS Classification
I was told that their is a specific FPS Classification between full metal guns and guns with a plastic receiver. My source could not tell me more about it and it made me curious.. Anyone can tell me more about it?
|
|
May 31st, 2011, 18:10 | #2 |
Plastic or metal don't make any differences. If by plastic your "source" meant *clear* receiver, there might be a slight diff as it *may* fall into a different category when it comes to gun classification (replica vs uncontrolled firearm vs whatvever)
But all in all it doesn't change anything. 300fps is still 300fps no matter what shoots the BB, right? But more importantly, I have to ask, despite my answer: what do you mean, or what is it you want to know exactly? |
|
May 31st, 2011, 18:15 | #3 |
My thought is that he gave me a random answer so i wont keep on asking why he can provide full metal guns but he cant get me a full metal receiver set. I just wanted to be sure that "classification" wasn't a lie.
|
|
May 31st, 2011, 18:18 | #4 | |
I think he may be speaking of this classification
http://www.007airsoft.com/legality.htm Quote:
|
||
May 31st, 2011, 18:28 | #5 |
Thanks :P
My question now is do you guys think it was a legal or a "do not want to" issue that made him refuse to get sell it to me? |
|
May 31st, 2011, 18:36 | #6 | |
Quote:
OR uncontrolled firearm if it is able to cause bodily harm. [edit]* if the plastic on the gun is painted, it is also considered a replica. To be considered a toy - it must contain CLEAR plastic. (usually lower receiver, and sometimes tinted clear plastic.) Last edited by Lambontae; May 31st, 2011 at 21:30.. |
||
May 31st, 2011, 18:38 | #7 |
Thanks alot mate :P
|
|
May 31st, 2011, 20:04 | #8 |
I like how specific "serious bodily harm" is... and how specific they are at 407 fps lol. Where 406 won't cause serious bodily harm, while 408 definitely will. Maybe permanent bodily harm, which is still somewhat vague, but serious is quite relative.
|
|
May 31st, 2011, 20:12 | #9 |
2 Cent Tactical
|
I line needs to be drawn somewhere. If you are vague with written law, leads to loop holes and confusion.
__________________
|
May 31st, 2011, 20:31 | #10 |
May 31st, 2011, 21:31 | #11 |
alright alright... FIXED!
Last edited by Lambontae; May 31st, 2011 at 21:35.. |
|
May 31st, 2011, 21:36 | #12 |
The person who you talked to was being vague about it or giving the simple short answer. But he is right and wasn't BSing you, receivers are far more tricky and some people cannot even import them and some of those who can won't due the extra trouble they cause.
There are a few threads with in the AV'd area that go in to more detail of this stuff.
__________________
W-69 _/| |
|
May 31st, 2011, 22:31 | #13 |
The CBSA Memorandum D19-13-2 and you...
Infraction: Showing non verified members how to import/purchase guns. This is a serious no no.
Last edited by voorhees -FWA-; May 31st, 2011 at 23:59.. |
|
June 1st, 2011, 15:11 | #14 |
June 1st, 2011, 15:14 | #15 |
That was his point.....
__________________
W-69 _/| |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|