Quote:
Originally Posted by KoolAidMan
how is the vfc a failure ? it seems to be donig good considering that they only realeased the M4 and theres no cooldown in the vids i've seen
|
The internal comes in are all scatched up, not just one person, but multiple cases.
Cooldown effect is only reduce because they used a lighter bolt carrier (I can do the same by using a lightweight one on WA. The efficiency for a <80g complete carrier can do 2 mag dump relatively easily) However, the bolt carrier is relatively weak, and thirdparty will require mod to fit.
The engraving down by VFC is poor compared to KA and G&P ones.
Did I mention the magazine is poor quality and that you need to mod WA mags to make it work on VFC?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninja_En_Short
I have it there are cooldowns, don't be fooled. And some parts are completly specific... which is why I modified the internal and don't recommand using VFC mags. Plus for really big custom it's not suited.
If I consider the quality/price ratio, a G&P WOC standard M4A1 with bomber mags is the best you can get. And the real steel dimensions on barrel nut and stock make the custom possibilty literraly limitless... I have to verify it but it seems you can adapt real steel uppers easily too (hellooooo VIS-1)
That's why I'm selling the VFC to get a G&P and make my big ccustom
|
G&P is slightly shorter than RS spec, go see the BS ATF post up saying how they converted a JG M4 (has the same spec as G&P and WA for receiver) to fire a .223REM. The result was pretty ghetto....using a rod to replace pivot pin because the JG lower is slightly shorter.
SEE ATF's BS on converting A WA spec GBBR into firing bullets (It has to be noted, it's probably safer if you build your own lower receiver from wood as a
guy did in the states