|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
December 4th, 2008, 19:42 | #1 |
Bullpups accuracy
Are Airsoft Bullpups much more accurate than classic design types?
EDIT: Sorry that wasn't very clear. Are bullpups worth getting? They have the same barrel length as rifles with a shorter total length, but I hear they are harder to upgrade. Last edited by Ranen; December 4th, 2008 at 19:47.. |
|
December 4th, 2008, 19:45 | #2 |
Red Wine & Adderall
|
Lets take the TM Aug for example, due to its design where the mechbox is seated in the rear end of the gun, this gives it the ability to have a longer barrel. A longer barrel does somewhat assist in accuracy.
Edit: was typing follow up, but please see ILLusions post below for additonal details.
__________________
"Its only a little bit on fire" Last edited by TokyoSeven; December 4th, 2008 at 19:49.. |
December 4th, 2008, 19:48 | #3 |
GBB Whisperer
|
The general design of airsoft bullpups allows the barrel to be stabilized over a greater area as well as have a much more efficient air seal design in and around the hop up chamber area.
In that regard, airsoft bullpups generally more accurate than other series (ie M4 / M16, G3, MP5) due to a much more stable design as well as more efficient pressure containment system. |
December 4th, 2008, 19:50 | #4 | |
Quote:
|
||
December 4th, 2008, 19:54 | #5 | |
Red Wine & Adderall
|
Quote:
As for upgardes, the same thing, many parts availble from many companies. Just stick to your correct version. As for accessories, I dont see why there would be any issue as such things are external and have nothing to do with internals.
__________________
"Its only a little bit on fire" |
|
December 4th, 2008, 19:56 | #6 |
AUG = most versatile airsoft bullpup
It's a standard V3 |
|
December 4th, 2008, 20:02 | #7 |
Bullpups can feel alittle unbalanced to some due to the mechbox being housed in the back. I've used a P90 and owned an AUG and both were alittle bottom heavy, they aren't my preference but perform well.
|
|
December 4th, 2008, 20:07 | #8 |
Okay thanks for the input guys. Im looking into more bullpups now. What are the most popular/available out of these three: FAMAS, L85A1, FN F2000?
|
|
December 4th, 2008, 20:11 | #9 | |
Quote:
.... the other two choices depend on your style of play; - FN2000 more CQB friendly (if bull pups weren't already) - L85A1 for field work Just my opnion. SHA DO
__________________
|
||
December 4th, 2008, 20:22 | #10 |
They're good versions of the FAMAS and L85 out. Google will find those.
FN2000? Not so much. Only JLS makes it, and apparently they're CRAP. AUG's are nice |
|
December 4th, 2008, 20:25 | #11 |
December 4th, 2008, 20:33 | #12 |
Like I said, Google will find a lot more information/reviews etc. I'd say STAR and Army, but I really have no experience with them.
|
|
December 4th, 2008, 20:34 | #13 |
8=======D
|
Bullpup
Many people report that bullpup designs are " ungainley" and unbalanced.. in truth they are just "different" than conventional configurations.
Someone used to an M4 or any conventionaly configured weapon will find it weird to deal with the layout of the fire controls and balance. Once you carry the weapon and use it for a while you soon find out the benefits. I have a STAR L85A2 , when I first fielded it .. I hated it.. the mag was in the wrong place.. the selector was in the wrong place... everything was screwy.. Then after I ran it for a while if found it in fact to be much more ergonomic than anythign else I had run. The mag well is very close to you .. and so you can make changes with less body movement and with no movement of the weapon while prone. The safety is right at the index finger on the strong side.. fromn safe to fire literally with a flick of the finger. The selector at the butt ... even works well while prone.. teh balance of the weapon places its weight more at your core so you can carry it .. and lift to ready faster and with less effort than another weapon of a conventional configuration.. Takes STANAG 4179 mags too ! this coupled with a very long barreled weapon in a package 4+ inches shorter than an M4 ... what could be better?
__________________
Brian McIlmoyle TTAC3 Director CAPS Range Officer Toronto Downtown Age Verifier OPERATION WOODSMAN If the tongue could cut as the sword does, the dead would be infinite |
December 4th, 2008, 20:35 | #14 | |
To my knowledge.
Star/Ares, ICS and Army are the only ones that make the L85.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
December 4th, 2008, 20:36 | #15 |
Exactly, people think the hind being heavier is a downfall. It makes it easier to swing around a rifle.
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|