Airsoft Canada
http://triggerairsoft.com/shop/

Go Back   Airsoft Canada > Discussion > Airsoft Guns Discussion
Home Forums Register Gallery FAQ Calendar
Retailers Community News/Info International Retailers IRC Today's Posts

CA36 or CA36K

:

Airsoft Guns Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 21st, 2006, 07:52   #1
ogrik
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Czech Republic
CA36 or CA36K

Hi everybody,
could you please help with selection between these two guns CA36 and CA36K?
If there is any different in performance (15 cm in barrel length).
I dont know if barrel length involves final fps, if it is possible to reach the same performance for example in 50 meters with both guns or if it differs (how much)...
I have to note, that I will upgrade it to M120, NBU set, accurate barrel.
Thank you for your answer/opinion especialy for your help.

Mira
Czech Republic
ogrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 08:35   #2
BC_K
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
The longer barrel will result in slightly greater accuracy & range, thats about it.

But as a stock gun, you wont really notice much difference in performance/ect until you start swapping parts.
BC_K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 09:28   #3
six4
 
six4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mission b.c.
Send a message via MSN to six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.
six4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 12:04   #4
Dozer_01
 
Dozer_01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.
1 word- Cocaine? :smack:
__________________
LLTP
Dozer_01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 12:14   #5
SHaKaL
 
SHaKaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Trois-Rivi?res
Send a message via MSN to SHaKaL
Quote:
Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.
I own a CA36K and its a great gun. No problems at all. The gun shoot 320 fps out of the box. The gun is very solid and all upgrade parts a readily available, everything that fit a TM will fit the CA, even the TM g36c upper rail (handle) fit the gun (i installed one for CQB).

So please dont talk with your ass...
SHaKaL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 13:05   #6
swatt13
Captain Awesome
 
swatt13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Greater Grande Prairie (greater than vancouver)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer_01
Quote:
Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.
1 word- Cocaine? :smack:
agreed. that was the biggest load ive ever heard.
longer barrel = better range 30-50 more fps (at best) as BC_k already said. k has the rds already integrated into the carry handle which is nice, but a little bulky for cqb use, the other is a versatile platform to build on, nice and compact, its up to you both are great guns (actually the same gun but different clothes on) where are you going to be playing most indoors or out? how much customizing to plan on doing (externally).
__________________
Age verifier southern Alberta

Quote:
Originally Posted by TokyoSeven
a Systema PTW is like KD, where the noodles are plated in gold and the cheese sauce is actually a pool of hot naked women.
swatt13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 14:08   #7
The Saint
 
The Saint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Quebec
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHaKaL
The gun shoot 320 fps out of the box.
Just for comparison, my CA36 shoots in the 320s on 0.25g BBs. I'd still recommend the K over the nil, though, the nil is rather clumsy.
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame."
The Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 14:44   #8
SHaKaL
 
SHaKaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Trois-Rivi?res
Send a message via MSN to SHaKaL
My hop up wasnt properly set when i chrono'ed it so maybe it shoot as hard as your'e
(same gun different style). Will rechrono it next game
SHaKaL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 14:48   #9
The Saint
 
The Saint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Quebec
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHaKaL
My hop up wasnt properly set when i chrono'ed it so maybe it shoot as hard as your'e
(same gun different style). Will rechrono it next game
Oh no, I was merely suggesting the amount of FPS difference between the K and the nil as a result of different barrel lengths by comparing your figures with mine.
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame."
The Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 17:26   #10
Rumpel Felt
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Send a message via MSN to Rumpel Felt
Quote:
Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.
Wow, it's like wasted hobo teaching calculus.

I'll give him this at least he read....something. And that something would be the now horribly inncorrect and stupid "CA bashing thread" which should be removed.

Your biggest mistake is NOT buying the CA model if they make it. TM is what will waste all your money, not CA.

The advice given to new people is not so much help when all it is "buy TM" (all though it's that persons fault for not researching) as it is TM fanboyism in which that all they've known and havn't actually tried CA and found out what they have been missing.

Anyway, I found that a rifle sized gun feels wierd with a folding stock. Also, the longer front end may get a harsher beating if you run around alot. A more compact carry and a quicker draw ability may be a good reason to go K or moreso, C, even though you didn't mention it.
Rumpel Felt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2006, 17:35   #11
CARL
 
CARL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Finland, Really?
I own the CA G36 C it works well in all circumstances go with the CA besides most parts are compatible with the TM parts and if you do break it just order new parts, big deal. The G36 K would be nice to own two its right in between and the best of both worlds.
CARL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2006, 20:02   #12
nic_s
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BC
Ahha, very informative thread here. I'm thinking about a K for myself, but my only concern was the inconsistent grease application from the factury. Have they solved this problem?
__________________
...and she's terribly partial to the periwinkle blue.
nic_s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2006, 20:03   #13
SHaKaL
 
SHaKaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Trois-Rivi?res
Send a message via MSN to SHaKaL
Yes its called, opening the mechbox and grease it ourselves.
SHaKaL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2006, 20:40   #14
SockMonkey
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Vancouver
Send a message via MSN to SockMonkey
Not every one is capable of "just opening the mechbox" I picked my self up a CA249 and while its a different box and all it looks pretty bombproof. The "TM fanboyisms" come from the fact that TM has a far better quality control than any of the other companies out there. Look at the early CA Mp5's.... Run and hide! from that I can see and heard CA has come along way and I personaly wouldnt hesitate buying a G36 in fact im considering it for my next loadout.
__________________
You know, there's like a butt-load of gangs at this school. This one gang kept wanting me to join because I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
SockMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2006, 23:34   #15
Droc
Guest
Quote:
Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.

haha
your 4 posts sure shows what you know...
  Reply With Quote
ReplyTop


Go Back   Airsoft Canada > Discussion > Airsoft Guns Discussion

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Airsoft Canada
http://triggerairsoft.com/shop/

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.