April 28th, 2010, 19:03 | #16 | |
Quote:
And who is this "someone"? where is this thread? your making very serious claims. Last edited by Rugger_can; April 28th, 2010 at 19:07.. |
||
April 28th, 2010, 19:15 | #17 |
Pick up some vforce shields.. if you can find it.
|
|
April 28th, 2010, 19:15 | #18 | |
a.k.a. Palucol
|
Quote:
Someone mentioned these googles from Canadian tire http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/brows....jsp?locale=en and I was talking about those, and not the JT Spectra goggles.... here's the link to the Review about those "airsoft approved" goggles (from Yuhaoyang) http://www.airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=84868 |
|
April 28th, 2010, 19:32 | #19 |
Turns out your right.. Checked the packaging. When I asked my wife to buy Paintball goggles for herself she checked online and liked the look of them. Canadian tire Claimed they where paintball approved (on their website). Im going to go down there and cause a shitstorm for misrepresenting their damn products and pick her up a new set of JT's from a local paintball shop.
Thanks for the heads up.. I guess I should have gone with her to pick them up and or checked the ACTUAL packaging after she got them home. My mistake for trusting JT's to make a qualitiy product. Thanks for the update. |
|
April 28th, 2010, 19:39 | #20 | |
Quote:
http://www.safetyglassesusa.com/11641.html This site wants $50 to ship and the cheapest shipping to Canada from any site was $28. So I jumped on ebay and found them for $28 total including shipping |
||
April 28th, 2010, 21:51 | #21 |
I just get safety glasses from my work place.
|
|
April 28th, 2010, 22:59 | #22 |
April 28th, 2010, 23:28 | #23 | |
Quote:
__________________
M4, L85, Mp5, Scar, Sig 552, M14 |
||
April 29th, 2010, 22:22 | #24 |
April 29th, 2010, 23:27 | #25 |
a.k.a. flamethis
|
|
April 30th, 2010, 00:04 | #26 | |
Quote:
I bought the JT Flex 8 goggles. |
||
April 30th, 2010, 02:40 | #27 | |
Quote:
Paintball goggles requires a minimum of ANSI 87.1+ rating to qualify for the "paintball" approved. I have contacted JT's demanding the safety specifications for these goggles, but they appear to have discontinued the line. Long and the short of it. Don't buy them. They fit great and are comfortable, but they are no safer then ski goggles. Infact never buy goggles that do not implicitly say ANSI 87.1 or 87.1 or 87.1+ ect. on the actual goggle surface. Even goggles that claim to be "milspec" is bullshit, as there is no consumer reporting required for that claim. its like "lite" products, there is no requirement to quantify them. I would rather wear crosman goggles that have the appropriate ANSI rating then trust 200 dollar "milspec" goggles that have no ANSI certification, I mean if your charging 200 bucks for goggles why not spring for the 80 dollars US to have them tested by ANSI so you can get them certified.. because they probably would not pass the testing. |
||
April 30th, 2010, 04:13 | #28 |
I don't care what crappy tire said on there site, those are not paintball approved. as I believe rugger stated?
__________________
M4, L85, Mp5, Scar, Sig 552, M14 |
|
April 30th, 2010, 12:45 | #29 |
April 30th, 2010, 14:06 | #30 |
I have a pair and i find them tight. I took the goggles out and kept them on my ibh helmet to stretch them out.. I also found that they were a really thick profile. I have ESS goggles as well so i'll prob use those more but i'll still use these ones too when they're needed..
__________________
-Dangerous- BA Level 3 Certified |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|