March 17th, 2008, 08:19 | #226 |
Official Crybaby Chairsofter
|
Very nice paper
Don't forget to tell me your grade |
March 17th, 2008, 08:31 | #227 |
formerly Sepulcrum
|
I know exactly how you feel, when this thread was started I was starting to get angry because if she were a dude everybody would have flamed the f*ck outa her and told her to do her own research.... the really sad part is that I'm among the younger end of the asc users (I'm 18) and somehow more mature than oh so many.
|
March 17th, 2008, 08:49 | #228 |
Yeah. It's one thing to introduce yourself and say hello to a new user, male or female. I try to do that equally. But this thread is just ridiculous at this point. Some people need to get laid more often.
__________________
|
|
March 17th, 2008, 09:07 | #229 |
Its true, All my posts end up in the trash within an hour. Of course I rarely have anything useful to post. Speaking of nothing useful this wont do much for your project but I cant stop watching it, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFYQwX2EayE
__________________
|
|
March 17th, 2008, 09:26 | #230 | ||
Quote:
Ld
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
March 17th, 2008, 09:53 | #231 |
it was a very rough draft, and
and it was for my English course in champlain, its just to show the teacher our research capabilities, and to show others in the course different subcultures. The level isn't meant to be very high it was just a quick project to help our teacher out, to see how he can help us in our research skills. |
|
March 17th, 2008, 09:56 | #232 | |
For that level it seems fine. The grammer needs a lot of work, but that's okay in a rough draft.
It only shows a limited research ability (from what I can tell) as it looks like your only sources were the internet or anecdotal. If you could fine some journal or book sources it could be very strong. Being self-referential in an academic paper is usually a no-no and reserved for more casual writing. Look forward to reading your conclusions. Ld
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Lawdog; March 17th, 2008 at 10:07.. |
||
March 17th, 2008, 10:02 | #233 |
Likes it BOLD attention whore MAXIMUS!
|
That paper was extremely thorough and articulate, deserves a 99%, this should be added to the FAQ's on the history and basics of airsoft.
Kudos on a great job! |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|