February 3rd, 2011, 19:22 | #151 |
February 3rd, 2011, 19:22 | #152 | |
Oh, apparently my understanding of how the retailers do it is wrong, must read more, btw thanks for pointing that out for me guys.
Yes it does, that's the second time info I have read as "fact" on this forum has turned out to be outdated. Perhaps someone could go through the faqs and fix these errors. (subtle hint for a mod with some time to kill)
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Wayne0188; February 3rd, 2011 at 19:28.. |
||
February 3rd, 2011, 19:29 | #153 |
Official ASC "Dumb Ass"
|
check the post date when reading, that should clue you in, then look for more recent info
__________________
|
February 3rd, 2011, 19:33 | #154 |
Yeah, There have been many developments since 2003 and the Airsoft initiative. It's been 8 years. And people have been defaulting on the "read the FAQs noob" crap for years but things have changed.
|
|
February 3rd, 2011, 19:33 | #155 |
February 3rd, 2011, 19:37 | #156 |
February 3rd, 2011, 19:41 | #157 | |
Quote:
http://www.airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=71224
__________________
W-69 _/| |
||
February 3rd, 2011, 19:46 | #158 | |
a.k.a. Bob Sickinger
|
Quote:
__________________
The Left JIHAD...works both ways |
|
February 3rd, 2011, 19:53 | #159 | |
Quote:
|
||
February 3rd, 2011, 19:54 | #160 |
E-01
|
Thread cleaned of childishness and a bunch of infractions handed out.
I'd explain it but I think I'll just let Darwinism follow its course.
__________________
|
February 3rd, 2011, 19:55 | #161 | |
Quote:
In the US a lot of places allow 12 year olds to play which i am completely against. Shooting a 12 year old isnt cool.
__________________
|
||
February 3rd, 2011, 19:55 | #162 |
Guest
|
Absolutely, you will. And no it wasn't you, it was some new guy a few pages back saying "quote me the law that says the cops don't need a warrant to enter your house".
Street lawyers piss me off because they're usually wrong, or half-right, and think they're experts. I also get pissed off because to me, this kind of bullshit conversation is offensive. It's offensive to me that anyone thinks it's ok to have to register any piece of property because "I have nothing to worry about if I'm not doing anything wrong". Except that with the stroke of a pen, you might very well be doing something wrong, and then they're coming for your property and laying charges against you if you can't, or won't produce it. And when that happens? Oh shit, I guess I never thought about it that way... ...Except a fuckton of us HAVE thought of it that way, we were the ones who got screwed by C68 and woke up as criminals for life with a temporary reprieve in the form of a firearms license, which can be revoked at the whim of the CFO based on little to no evidence, and BLAMO we're fucking criminals just like that. Now, this pisses me off because we yell, and we scream about how much of a baaaad idea it is to accept registration of your property, as if your property were capable of inflicting harm by itself, and by extension you become a dangerous person who can't be trusted with plastic toys that are worthy of being "Registered"...and the answer I see is "You're paranoid". I'm not fucking paranoid....I lost like everyone else when they screwed us the first time and I will not be screwed again. We register GUNS in the country, but not SEX OFFENDERS. |
February 3rd, 2011, 20:09 | #163 | |
Quote:
No citizen of a free nation should ever willingly relinquish their rights to enjoyment of their private property. Somewhere along the line people all nodded along as property rights where violated all in the name of government knows best. Simply put, take responsibility for your ownership of your property and your actions with said property. Cheers |
||
February 3rd, 2011, 20:12 | #164 |
Guest
|
And most of the people that think it's a good idea do so because it doesn't affect them personally. That self-centered, self-important but oh so Liberal mentality that because something seems like a bad idea to them, it should be prohibited from everybody, less their own bias or ignorance somehow allow someone else to prove them wrong.
"Do you support the gun registry?" "Oh of course. Guns are dangerous". "And do you think the Government should have strict requirements for licensing of gun owners?" "Oh of course, guns are dangerous." "And do you think background checks should be conducted before a license is issued?" "Oh absolutely. Guns are dangerous". "Do you own any firearms?" "Of course not. Guns are dangerous." "Do you think semi-automatic machine guns and assault pistols should be banned?" "Oh, nobody needs a gun that can shoot a dozen bullets with a single pull of the trigger!" Ask the same person about kitchen knives. Well that's different...they have those in the kitchen and they'd never use them to hurt anybody so why should they need a license for them? They're just kitchen knives after all. Last edited by MadMorbius; February 3rd, 2011 at 20:18.. |
February 3rd, 2011, 20:18 | #165 | |
Quote:
Problem is "they" fail to recognize that no inanimate object is dangerous, it is the person misusing the object that presents the danger. Hell a table leg is dangerous if I bludgeon someone with it, but we would never consider registering furniture now would we. Just another case of ignoring reality. |
||
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|