April 17th, 2009, 02:39 | #31 | |
Well, I agree with pretty much every response to your little review there. I've had none of the issues you describe. My only complaint about the E90 is that the front grip flexes and creaks an ever so slight bit. Otherwise worth every bit of the $350 I paid for it.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
April 17th, 2009, 10:29 | #32 | |
Quote:
__________________
"Everything will be OK in the end. If it's not OK, it's not the end." |
||
April 17th, 2009, 10:36 | #33 | |
Heh, sounds like it also suffered from incorrect repairing.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
April 17th, 2009, 10:53 | #34 |
Yeah, I have a feeling this was those one in a million. Maybe something E1 didn't want either. Who knows.
__________________
"Everything will be OK in the end. If it's not OK, it's not the end." |
|
April 17th, 2009, 10:57 | #35 | |
Quote:
That's a review for the ACM P90. From what I've been gathering online to date, the E1 and ACM are NOT the same gun, but rather the ACM is a poor copy of the E1. I can guarantee that my E90 has none of the problems listed in this review. Casting of the metal upper is of excellent quality and is as straight and precise as it should be. Everything is straight, lines up well, and fits together as it should. There are no wobbles, loose parts, etc. This is a solid, well built gun. I had a chance to give it a side by side comparison to 2 TMs at a game a couple of weeks ago. I'll conceed the TM has higher quality ABS in the main body, although I like the more textured feel / lower shine of the Echo 1. And of course, the TM has all the correct FN trademarks and such, which the Echo 1 lacks. But if that's really an issue to anyway, you can legally import a TM plastic lower for really cheap, and the E1 receiver slides right on to the TM body effortlessly. Otherwise though, if I had the choice of a brand new TM or E1 for the same price, I would still pick the E1 hands down.
__________________
|
||
April 17th, 2009, 11:08 | #36 |
Ah, then I need to rewrite that review. I checked a lot of pics, and it's as close to identical as I could see. I bought an E1 gearbox myself, and everything was identical down to the overlubing. My friend joked that they had assembled it, and then lubed it in a tub full of grease. I laughed, but when I opened it I wasn't laughing anymore. It actually spat grease into my barrel o.0
__________________
"Everything will be OK in the end. If it's not OK, it's not the end." |
|
April 17th, 2009, 11:11 | #37 | |
The E1 mechbox has a retarded amount of grease in it. I didn't clean it yet because quite frankly I didn't feel like it.. but it's on my list of things to do.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
April 17th, 2009, 11:37 | #38 |
I haven't opened my mechbox, so can't comment on its internal lube job. Once I actually need to get into it, I'll report back.
__________________
|
|
April 17th, 2009, 12:09 | #39 | |
I opened it to swap out the spring with a stock CA one. I think I'll just order a new complete mechbox for outdoor gaming. Gotta love the P90.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
April 17th, 2009, 12:32 | #40 | |
Quote:
|
||
April 17th, 2009, 12:42 | #41 |
The upper receiver is restricted. That's the part that holds the barrel, etc. It's the part on the real steel that has the serial number. The plastic lower isn't restricted.
__________________
|
|
April 17th, 2009, 12:56 | #42 |
Yeah! I bought mine when I was all new to airsoft, and was blown away by how easy it is it take out the mechbox, compared to most other softguns. My SIG 552 is a nightmare to disassemble in comparison. I also decided to go for a 2x mechbox setup, as opposed to upgrading my stock TM one. That way I can have one for indoors (300FPS or less), and one for outdoors (350ish FPS). Just make sure you take off the upper receiver, when you insert the mechbox!
__________________
"Everything will be OK in the end. If it's not OK, it's not the end." |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|