MilSim input needed.....

Trader rating · August 22nd, 2006, 09:07

We've done it here. It's easy to take a bunch of team mates and have them play "actor" like roles in support of a scenario. It's MUCH easier to control the flow of the game, as well.

They don't have to be ACTORS people....you're thinking too literal. Airsofters playing roles are actors in this sense, so you do get some skill on the opfor throwing plastic at you, but they're working in support of the scenario instead of in support of their own victory.

Scarecrow · August 22nd, 2006, 09:55

^^^ what he said

Home	Forums	Register	Gallery	FAQ	Calendar
Retailers	Community	News/Info	International Retailers	IRC	Today's Posts

British Columbia	Alberta
BCAC	EAR
Op-For	JOC
Northern Arms Airsoft	Skunkworx Airsoft
Airsoft Kelowna	RAAT
Prince George Airsoft	Manitoba
Saskatchewan	MAA
SK Airsoft	Ontario
PDW	Airsoft Ottawa
South Sask Mercs	Snow Dragons
Quebec	1st Ranger Platoon
PQAC	Wolfpack Tactical
1st Pathfinders Regiment	TTAC3
Quebec Airsoft
MTX Airsoft	Atlantic
FAQc	Atlantic Airsoft

View Poll Results: What type of MilSim do you prefer?
Force on Force, where the op-for is made up of other airsofters	127	67.91%
Intericate scenarios where you play against an unknown element (ie actors, extras)	60	32.09%
Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll

August 22nd, 2006, 09:55	#17
Scarecrow A Total Bastard Trader rating Join Date: May 2003 Location: Tottenham	^^^ what he said __________________ LIKE us on Facebook!!

August 22nd, 2006, 09:07	#16
MadMorbius Guest Trader rating	We've done it here. It's easy to take a bunch of team mates and have them play "actor" like roles in support of a scenario. It's MUCH easier to control the flow of the game, as well. They don't have to be ACTORS people....you're thinking too literal. Airsofters playing roles are actors in this sense, so you do get some skill on the opfor throwing plastic at you, but they're working in support of the scenario instead of in support of their own victory.

MilSim input needed.....

General