Which Gun Is the Best out of these???

[THe_Silencer]

Originally Posted by Tempest VI

Why does everyone say metal is way better? It's not any different from plastic. I've physically meet people who’s held a military grade M4/C7/C8. They even said themselves that the only part that's metal is the upper receiver.

Why? Metal is not necessarily better, it's just looks and feels more realistic. Those people that you've physically met that held military grade ar-15s, they have no clue what they're talking about because ar-15 have aluminum uppers and lowers.

To answer the OP's question the KA has MUCH better internals than the G&G. Steel gear, superb internal plastics, a piston head that ain't shit, etc. They also make some of the best receivers on the market. Personally I think the KA is the best ar-15 on the market for that price. If this doesn't convince you to buy it then I don't know what will.

[shiftsup]

Originally Posted by shiftsup

Yeah, the G & G has better stock internals than the KA; that is a no brainer.

Originally Posted by Amos

I disagree with this quite a bit. G&G uses a magnesium alloy gears, and has an AWFUL piston head design. The KA gearboxes I've seen have been built right with proper materials.

My understanding is that this particular line of G & G aeg uses steel gears; but hey I am only going on from online reviews and whatnot.

I have only worked on four KA AEG's. Didn't care for the spring guides in both the KA V2 and V3 gearboxes. The nozzle and tappet plates on the FAL's had issues too. Other than that I didn't see anything "wrong".

Never worked on a G & G ( I have a SOC 16 somewhere); but a few guys around here have them. I don't see these guys leaving a skirmish to fix their aeg in the safe zone....yet.

And concerning the holy awesomeness of metal receivers; I am pretty sure that AR's have aircraft aluminum upper and lower receivers. If you desire realism in an aeg you might want a receiver that somewhat matches the build of the RS version; not much different than the dislike some people of faux wood on AK's, Thompsons and M14's etc.

Again, I recommend the KA M4A1.

[SilverGrape78]

Almost everyone is saying get the King Arms.Can an 8.4v mini battery fit in the handguard?

[THe_Silencer]

Yes. A 9.6v mini nunchuck will too.

[iKliiu]

Originally Posted by Amos

I don't think anyone here is saying "GO BUY DBOYS, THEY'RE METAL!!"

Doesn't dboys have full steel version of some of their aks?

[SilverGrape78]

Originally Posted by shiftsup

My understanding is that this particular line of G & G aeg uses steel gears; but hey I am only going on from online reviews and whatnot.

I have only worked on four KA AEG's. Didn't care for the spring guides in both the KA V2 and V3 gearboxes. The nozzle and tappet plates on the FAL's had issues too. Other than that I didn't see anything "wrong".

Never worked on a G & G ( I have a SOC 16 somewhere); but a few guys around here have them. I don't see these guys leaving a skirmish to fix their aeg in the safe zone....yet.

And concerning the holy awesomeness of metal receivers; I am pretty sure that AR's have aircraft aluminum upper and lower receivers. If you desire realism in an aeg you might want a receiver that somewhat matches the build of the RS version; not much different than the dislike some people of faux wood on AK's, Thompsons and M14's etc.

Again, I recommend the KA M4A1.

Is the magwell big?Like slightly bigger than normal M4s?The G&Gs magwell is slightly bigger for some reason.

[SilverGrape78]

Originally Posted by moz_boz

I don't know if I just got lucky or what, but I have a G&G M4 with stock internals...I am already at a year with no problems.

Buying shit or buying quality does have an effect, but taking it apart or abusing the shit out of it at a game will shorten the life of even the highest quality AEGs.

Which G&G M4?