Quote:
Originally Posted by pivot
I think what we need to do is to formulate a standard whereby all accuracy tests are performed under. ie: distance, fps, performed indoors, bench rested, parts used in the setup, bb used, accurately measured groupings, etc... Then whack it into a spreadsheet and start overlapping the similarities between the tests. After a boatload of tests, data should start emerging where we can actually point to parts that are consistantly better than others. Wouldn't be too difficult, as it would only take a little while to do a gun with different bb's and/or weights. If enough people participated we'd have a ton of info really quick.
|
I agree. There must be enough people with access to an indoor range of up to 100 feet to make it possible to generate data. The data management would be a bit labour intensive, though.