Thread: CA or not
View Single Post
Old November 1st, 2007, 19:44   #17
Enox
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderCactus View Post
I believe Enox is referring to his CA249, in which case it IS typical for a stock CA gun to break down quickly (from my own experience seeing alot of CA's break down), especially an LMG. Classic Army internals are certainly nothing to brag about, but there are a few specifically weak parts that are prone to failure (tappet, gears, piston). It does have a fantastic gearbox shell, however, and upgraded properly, a 249 can be made to be very reliable.
Thundercactus is bang on with his statement.The 249 has had about 12,000 rounds thru it so far and am alittle upset that within 2 months it's broken.So I've decided to upgrade it to the nuts and hopefully it will last more than a few months this time.For $1500 you sure don't get a reliable gun!
P.S. Frank thanks for clearing my post up alittle!
Enox is offline   Reply With Quote