Thread: M-LOK or KeyMod
View Single Post
Old May 9th, 2017, 18:46   #13
Datawraith
 
Datawraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Markham
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperHog View Post
M-Lok rails cost less to machine than KeyMod. Why do you care?
Didn't say anything about it being cheaper to machine (though that's almost definitely true); I said it's easier to machine. I've been thinking about machining my own handguard as I have access to a 5-axis CNC milling machine. I'd definitely do M-Lok as opposed to Keymod.

Also, purely from an engineering standpoint, with such a complex geometry, more things can go wrong with the Keymod design. The corners could wear or fracture off and that attachment point is useless. From what I can see, there's literally nothing on the M-Lok rail short of the entire rail fracturing that could damage the mounting point beyond repair.

If you want to go deeper and look at it from a quality control standpoint, it's also simpler to check M-Lok. Just get a set of digital calipers and run it the length of the rails. Good luck checking Keymod. And if tolerances are off, your attachments won't be as secure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperHog View Post
I have both and over a period of time, the M-Lok accessories rips up the inside of the rail surfaces and exposes raw alum. Because it is a tight friction fit, the satin finish is abrasive.
But... Keymod is also a tight friction fit... Why wouldn't the Keymod system do the same thing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperHog View Post
M-Lok is not exactly open source. Rail makers have to sign an agreement to use the M-Lok logos or make any reference to the M-Lok design. The agreement I don't believe is available to airsoft manufacturers.
Since when has that ever stopped airsoft manufacturers...

Last edited by Datawraith; May 9th, 2017 at 19:02..
Datawraith is offline   Reply With Quote