Quote:
Originally Posted by kullwarrior
Can you give me the court appeal case Link? or the Number?
I havent seen this yet, the cause significant injurt clause I've seen was with a KSC USP firing 350fps. The appealler was saying it could cause eye injury, but still lost to CBSA since Federal follow the 407 w/ .22g or 430fps w/ .2g rule
|
Court was not involved..and is not in most cases
The court is only involved in cases where import offences are committed by importers and the defense entered is +407
Most of those cases don't go well, as the issue is license infractions
The cases I know of are individuals who have items seized by CBSA and they appeal the seizure... CPSE then send the item to the RCMP to be tested .. and then release it after testing proves its a non replica , unregulated firearm.