View Single Post
Old September 3rd, 2009, 02:12   #47
kullwarrior
 
kullwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian McIlmoyle View Post
some people have had items seized as replicas and appealed based on the "capable of causing significant injury" clause .. Once tested and found to shoot over 407 fps but under 5.7 joules Muzzle energy their items were released having been proven to be "non replica" Unregulated firearms.
Can you give me the court appeal case Link? or the Number?
I havent seen this yet, the cause significant injurt clause I've seen was with a KSC USP firing 350fps. The appealler was saying it could cause eye injury, but still lost to CBSA since Federal follow the 407 w/ .22g or 430fps w/ .2g rule
__________________
kullwarrior is offline   Reply With Quote