Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   new pistol. super bad ass (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=57640)

Jayne Finch April 23rd, 2008 22:22

new pistol. super bad ass
 
ok. so i dont know if anyone has seen this yet but FN has released a new pistol sporting a 20 ROUND CLIP! yeah. but heres the best part it fires the P90 5.56x28mm ammo!

http://www.fnhusa.com/le/products/fi...01&mid=FNM0129

thats the write-up at fn usa. now take a look at this little slice of heaven

http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgur...3Doff%26sa%3DG

now i want to know. who wants the real one, who wants the airsoft one, and who wants BOTH!?

The Saint April 23rd, 2008 22:24

It's a sporting version of the FiveseveN, what's the big deal? You weren't aware of the FiveseveN before this?

Marushin makes one, I think there's a couple for sale in the GBB sale forum. TM is also coming out with one, whenever they get around to it.

mcguyver April 23rd, 2008 22:26

http://www.airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=56281

DuffMan April 23rd, 2008 22:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayne Finch (Post 702164)
but heres the worst part it fires the P90 5.7x28mm ammo!

Corrected. 5.7mm sucks shit.

ThunderCactus April 23rd, 2008 22:32

Magazine, clip's are what you put in internal magazine style rifles.

Styrak April 23rd, 2008 22:36

The FiveseveN is HOW OLD?

EDIT: Looked it up. 8 YEARS AGO.


And what's so bad about 5.7mm? It's armor-piercing at least.

Jayne Finch April 23rd, 2008 22:45

didnt know it was that old. i just saw it a week ago in a gun mag.

[QUOTE=Duff_Man_in_CADPATs;702173][QUOTE=

Corrected. 5.7mm sucks shit./QUOTE]

better than 9mm

sorry. i do know the difference between a mag and a clip and when did grimm get those? now i need 300+ bucks. fuck

Sergeantmajor April 23rd, 2008 22:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duff_Man_in_CADPATs (Post 702173)
Corrected. 5.7mm sucks shit.

the fact is freaking rare sucks, but it has its uses. if it was a more common round i'd be all over it. but...its not.

and it hasnt been on the market for too long, maybe 2-3 years max. before it was for LE/military only AFAIK.

Questar has some RS for...1,399 peanuts.

Lakonian April 23rd, 2008 23:10

HK45. Nuff said.

http://mytedium.com/guns/hk/HK45-StillLife.jpg

Bowers April 23rd, 2008 23:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 702210)

+1

Amos April 23rd, 2008 23:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 702210)

Oh god...

It's like the outcome of a fight between a USP and Fisher Price...

Lakonian April 23rd, 2008 23:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos (Post 702224)
Oh god...

It's like the outcome of a fight between a USP and Fisher Price...

Check out who helped design it.

You're far too quick to judge, man. Seriously.. lol

Qlong April 23rd, 2008 23:44

Fisherprice > Five Seven

Love the compact.

Captain Tenneal April 23rd, 2008 23:54

Hoorah for civilianized copies of restricted weapons firing ammunition that makes it no better than high velocity .22! If the ACTUAL SS190 Ball rounds were available at a modestly cheap price, then this might be something to shout about.

But, admittedly the USG hasn't been around that long (IIRC 2005), so I suppose we can give them points for innovation.

And yeah: HK45, at least now they're not ripping people off for their own proprietary rail anymore.

Lakonian April 24th, 2008 00:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tenneal (Post 702249)

And yeah: HK45, at least now they're not ripping people off for their own proprietary rail anymore.

I'm sure Mr.Vickers chewed 'em out about that one ;) hahahh

Styrak April 24th, 2008 00:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tenneal (Post 702249)
And yeah: HK45, at least now they're not ripping people off for their own proprietary rail anymore.

Care to elaborate for the ones not in the loop?

Lakonian April 24th, 2008 00:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Styrak (Post 702274)
Care to elaborate for the ones not in the loop?

HK USPs use a rail that requires very specific attachments, as the rail isn't milspec picatinny.

There are conversion kits out there, however they can get pricey.

tycho April 24th, 2008 00:29

Heh - you only saw it a week ago? Have you never played Counter Strike??

Amos April 24th, 2008 00:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 702233)
Check out who helped design it.

You're far too quick to judge, man. Seriously.. lol

... The queen of england could have helped design it for all I care. I'm just stating purely based on aesthetics that it looks like it was designed by fisher price. (At least the brownish ones that you posted a picture of) :)

ToTaL_oWnAgE April 24th, 2008 00:30

Stargate SG1 called, They want there 5.7 round back

Styrak April 24th, 2008 00:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 702278)
HK USPs use a rail that requires very specific attachments, as the rail isn't milspec picatinny.

There are conversion kits out there, however they can get pricey.

Wow, that's ass-tastic.

ColtFarmer April 24th, 2008 00:45

may I just posit here, why in the blue fuck would they make an airsoft version of the CIVILLIAN FiveseveN??

jamesaddiction April 24th, 2008 00:46

I am sure this has been argued to death, but if armour piercing is what you need, why not go for the tried and true .223 or .308? I guess thats just me since I know in a real life situation, one would trust these rounds to get the job done.

What was the point in developing the 5.7mm anyways? Was it to get armour-piercing without shooting through walls and injuring other people?

Danke April 24th, 2008 00:53

The Five Seven's pretty much a gotta have for anyone with P90.

As for the USP rail so what, I prefer that that type of lower profile rail to the more aggressive types like on a SIG etc. Adapters are like $20 unless you're looking for something silly then it's maybe $90.

Captain Tenneal April 24th, 2008 00:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColtFarmer (Post 702303)
may I just posit here, why in the blue fuck would they make an airsoft version of the CIVILLIAN FiveseveN??

It is and it isn't. The Five-seveN USG is designed for the US Government, and by civilian, it's meant 'Law Enforcement'. There are other variants supposedly in use with other military forces around the world. But, the USG variant is not supposed to be in the hands of civilians. The PS-90 variant of the P90 is however, but the AP ball rounds are definetly supposed to stay out of civilian hands, and an expensive non-armour piercing round was developed for civilians, but it's no better than firing .22's at people.


AFA the 5.7x28mm round goes, it's designed to fire a bullet capable of defeating CRISAT with a very LOW recoil impulse. This being said, it's still no substitute for the stopping power and damage of 5.56 or 7.62, but at close ranges it's more accurate due to lower recoil. The round also has a very low chance of ricochet and overpenetration (at least, that's what's shown in their video featuring the P90 and the SS190 round that's fired out of the 5-7)

Danke April 24th, 2008 01:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesaddiction (Post 702306)
I am sure this has been argued to death, but if armour piercing is what you need, why not go for the tried and true .223 or .308? I guess thats just me since I know in a real life situation, one would trust these rounds to get the job done.

What was the point in developing the 5.7mm anyways? Was it to get armour-piercing without shooting through walls and injuring other people?

The pistol/SMG chapter from the same book.

Lighter, smaller, less recoil, more accurate, more in the magazine, the ability to penetrate Mil-Spec helmets and vests but still create a massive wound by tumbling.

Captain Tenneal April 24th, 2008 01:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danke (Post 702327)
The pistol/SMG chapter from the same book.

Lighter, smaller, less recoil, more accurate, more in the magazine, the ability to penetrate Mil-Spec helmets and vests but still create a massive wound by tumbling.

I don't believe it does that much damage via tumbling, or if it does it slows down a lot. Look at the promo video and they have a picture of the NATO ballistic gel tests. Not much tumbling displayed there. In fact the RCMP did testing with it vs. ballistic gel covered by Lev II body armour and without and the penetration was less than spectacular and didn't meet the minimums of penetration that normal handgun rounds offer.

No substitute for .45 ACP! :D

Danke April 24th, 2008 01:37

That's the Belgian bumf on the logic behind the round. I guess you'd have to be putting vests on some sort of livestock and popping rounds off at them.

Wouldn't want to have to sort that one out in the press when it got out!

Styrak April 24th, 2008 01:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesaddiction (Post 702306)
What was the point in developing the 5.7mm anyways? Was it to get armour-piercing without shooting through walls and injuring other people?

The idea was to have more of a rifle-punch in an SMG round.

PaCHeKo! April 24th, 2008 06:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToTaL_oWnAgE (Post 702283)
Stargate SG1 called, They want there 5.7 round back

Hahahah good one ;)

DuffMan April 24th, 2008 12:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayne Finch (Post 702186)
better than 9mm

We agree to disagree.

RacingManiac April 24th, 2008 12:36

I still like the new FNH45 better....

Danke April 24th, 2008 14:23

Well if we're going to start this now I'd like Browning BDM.

hattrick April 24th, 2008 17:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tenneal (Post 702336)
I don't believe it does that much damage via tumbling, or if it does it slows down a lot. Look at the promo video and they have a picture of the NATO ballistic gel tests. Not much tumbling displayed there. In fact the RCMP did testing with it vs. ballistic gel covered by Lev II body armour and without and the penetration was less than spectacular and didn't meet the minimums of penetration that normal handgun rounds offer.

No substitute for .45 ACP! :D

and the thread ended right here.

Azathoth April 24th, 2008 21:40

Isnt the 5.7mm round banned in Canada for it's AP/tumbling properties

Sergeantmajor April 24th, 2008 21:56

only the AP is banned.

nothing beats the good ol' 1911.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.