![]() |
Soo... when are they going to make an AR like that? ;)
|
Quote:
Can't wait for it to come out! Cheers, Alex |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Requires additional recoil. :|
|
Quote:
I'd drop the PTW, and get one... if ONLY they had a "103/4" configuration. |
Oh shit it's FULL DICAST RECEIVER!!
|
After seeing those videos Im far less impressed. Real Sword AK looks far more impressive to me. No blow back but with all steel parts would be a much better built I think. Im hoping because the RS used real factory wood that I can just swap it with any real steel wood that I want.
|
Pretty damn slick lookin'. Be hard to do an AR I think though but would be kick ass if they did. If the AK had just a bit more recoil I'd soil myself and definitely start saving up. But even the action along is nice and the mag looks promising, maybe no more 3 wasted BBs or dry firing.
|
I say making it blowback is bad idea. Bolt looks better but like any other TM AK, it doesn't go all the way back. Also, ROF of airsoft AK is a lot higher than RS, bolt movement just doesn't look right. It looks more like a sewing machine. I don't like the idea with mags as well. I own two TM based AK's and one CA. I have mags that work in all three guns, I won't buy something that is not interchangeable with my other guns. I'm with Slick, I'd rather get Real Sword AK or VFC.
Skladfin, these days monkey metal AK receivers are dying out, steel is the way to go. I'm pretty sure most of manufacturers will have AK with a steel body/barrel on the market. |
Yeah that ROF with the bolt going just looks and sounds wrong.
|
I also don't see how this "recoil" will "make the user hold the gun more realistically", like TM claimed...
Still, this piece looks damn cool. |
Quote:
|
Hmmm...The "recoil" does look a bit mediocre. Not as cool as I thought...If that effect raises the price by a large amount, TM just lost a customer.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.