Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   TM AK74 on the way.... (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=45435)

Lakonian October 15th, 2007 14:30

Soo... when are they going to make an AR like that? ;)

ancorp October 15th, 2007 14:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skruface (Post 554873)
NOW WITH VIDEO POWAH!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxcCTAgDwP0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmMs7O6V5QQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtILPj39pBE

Holy hell, nice ROF. Look at the last video - not much "recoil", but probably reciprocal motion similar to my AK with a metal piston.

Indeed the ROF is very nice, and the "recoil" is definitely good enough for me, seems much more impressive then the Guarder autoback kit in terms of "vibration". Must be due to a significantly heavier bolt carrier?

Can't wait for it to come out!

Cheers,
Alex

Lakonian October 15th, 2007 14:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancorp (Post 554890)
Indeed the ROF is very nice, and the "recoil" is definitely good enough for me, seems much more impressive then the Guarder autoback kit in terms of "vibration". Must be due to a significantly heavier bolt carrier?

Can't wait for it to come out!

Cheers,
Alex

The auto-back kit isn't as impressive as I though. Mediocre at best, really. :(

ancorp October 15th, 2007 14:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 554891)
The auto-back kit isn't as impressive as I though. Mediocre at best, really. :(

You bought one??

Lakonian October 15th, 2007 15:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by ancorp (Post 554895)
You bought one??

Was going to... until I saw it in real life :p

Andres October 15th, 2007 20:00

Requires additional recoil. :|

Lakonian October 15th, 2007 20:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andres (Post 555145)
Requires additional recoil. :|

+1

I'd drop the PTW, and get one... if ONLY they had a "103/4" configuration.

Skladfin October 15th, 2007 20:12

Oh shit it's FULL DICAST RECEIVER!!

Slick October 15th, 2007 20:45

After seeing those videos Im far less impressed. Real Sword AK looks far more impressive to me. No blow back but with all steel parts would be a much better built I think. Im hoping because the RS used real factory wood that I can just swap it with any real steel wood that I want.

S.H.I.E.L.D. October 15th, 2007 21:16

Pretty damn slick lookin'. Be hard to do an AR I think though but would be kick ass if they did. If the AK had just a bit more recoil I'd soil myself and definitely start saving up. But even the action along is nice and the mag looks promising, maybe no more 3 wasted BBs or dry firing.

666 October 15th, 2007 21:25

I say making it blowback is bad idea. Bolt looks better but like any other TM AK, it doesn't go all the way back. Also, ROF of airsoft AK is a lot higher than RS, bolt movement just doesn't look right. It looks more like a sewing machine. I don't like the idea with mags as well. I own two TM based AK's and one CA. I have mags that work in all three guns, I won't buy something that is not interchangeable with my other guns. I'm with Slick, I'd rather get Real Sword AK or VFC.

Skladfin, these days monkey metal AK receivers are dying out, steel is the way to go. I'm pretty sure most of manufacturers will have AK with a steel body/barrel on the market.

Styrak October 15th, 2007 21:31

Yeah that ROF with the bolt going just looks and sounds wrong.

Lakonian October 15th, 2007 22:13

I also don't see how this "recoil" will "make the user hold the gun more realistically", like TM claimed...

Still, this piece looks damn cool.

ancorp October 15th, 2007 22:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 555269)
I also don't see how this "recoil" will "make the user hold the gun more realistically", like TM claimed...

Still, this piece looks damn cool.

Yeah thats true. It VIBRATES, not recoils. Same as firing blanks, where its just the action cycling. Fun, but not enough to throw off your aim IMO.

Communist October 15th, 2007 22:28

Hmmm...The "recoil" does look a bit mediocre. Not as cool as I thought...If that effect raises the price by a large amount, TM just lost a customer.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:41.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.