Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   "B.L. Tech Airsoft Gun Sound Simulator" (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=160117)

pusangani November 29th, 2013 18:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huron (Post 1849425)
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...64/241/9e9.gif

I'm curious if they'll be able to get the same tone out of one sized to fit in a PEQ box, and if they'll be able to modulate it to sound a bit deeper for 7.62 guns.

I want it to make that clat clatter sound that ak's make

666 November 29th, 2013 18:48

Blank firing people and I had discussion about something like that just this last weekend. How to combine real steel sound and something that is actually can hit you... This thing is great!

Chillyrabbit November 29th, 2013 20:04

I think its a bad idea for indoors. A decently loud sound in an enclosed space? Might blow your ears.

Mcbain500 November 29th, 2013 22:52

2 things every military in the world would like to get rid of.
1. Recoil
2. Sound
So for your true MILSIM guys this would not even be on the radar because you want stealth and accuracy to achieve your goals.
Now if you want to run around and let everyone know your position because you want your Airsoft gun to sound real then knock yourself out.

Kos-Mos November 29th, 2013 23:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mcbain500 (Post 1851183)
2 things every military in the world would like to get rid of.
1. Recoil
2. Sound
So for your true MILSIM guys this would not even be on the radar because you want stealth and accuracy to achieve your goals.
Now if you want to run around and let everyone know your position because you want your Airsoft gun to sound real then knock yourself out.

You don't quite get the point I guess.

Every operator wants less recoil and less noise signature.
However, until we invent portable laser weapons, it's not going to be the case.

Because of that, operators have to work hard and employ tactics suited to the tools available.

Now because airsoft guns don't have much recoil and barely makes any noise, basic stuff like FoF identification, steath approach, reconnaissance, target and line of fire evaluation and choice are not really relevant. By the time your target spots you, you had time to hose down lots of precise shots.

Having to cope with the fact that if you miss or miscalculate your position or the enemy's forces and movement changes EVERYTHING.

That comes from a guy playing GBBRs all summer. It does have a louder signature than any AEG, and at least a little recoil. Still, it's closed to a suppressed .22LR than a 5.56 supersonic round.

Having that kind of device on your gun would force you to adapt to a more realistic situation, with the benefit that you can use an AEG or ERG to add reliability and drop entry price.

pusangani November 29th, 2013 23:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mcbain500 (Post 1851183)
2 things every military in the world would like to get rid of.
1. Recoil
2. Sound
So for your true MILSIM guys this would not even be on the radar because you want stealth and accuracy to achieve your goals.
Now if you want to run around and let everyone know your position because you want your Airsoft gun to sound real then knock yourself out.

wrong, so wrong

Milsim guys will be all over this as they are in search of fucking realism, which is what this provides, see Kos-Mos posts for the rest.

GBBR November 30th, 2013 00:57

LCT AK with Daytona kit, never stop GBB lol - YouTube

I got da recoil, now for the noise !

Aj619 November 30th, 2013 03:52

To be honest it sounds a lot like my Etek 3 paintball gun without paint in it maybe a little louder

But the video really doesn't help with DB testing you need to run a DB tester. not just the audio off some video.

Mcbain500 November 30th, 2013 22:44

I guess the MILSIM guys I play with have a different idea because none of them want it either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pusangani (Post 1851189)
wrong, so wrong

Milsim guys will be all over this as they are in search of fucking realism, which is what this provides, see Kos-Mos posts for the rest.


Jimsbeanz December 1st, 2013 01:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mcbain500 (Post 1851334)
I guess the MILSIM guys I play with have a different idea because none of them want it either.

Isn't the goal of MILSIM to replicate RL conditions as accurately as possible(ie. GBBR is favored over AEG and using Real cap)?

Having to deal with the loudness of guns(and give away your position) is what happens in RL.

Although i'm glad they said they're putting in a volume adjustment.

pusangani December 1st, 2013 09:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mcbain500 (Post 1851334)
I guess the MILSIM guys I play with have a different idea because none of them want it either.

sure whatever you say noob

Mcbain500 December 1st, 2013 10:48

Because the guys I play with don't want it we are noobs.lol
You sir are a funny manchild.
Quote:

Originally Posted by pusangani (Post 1851372)
sure whatever you say noob


Mcbain500 December 1st, 2013 10:52

Just a heads up none of us are operators.
I will take no recoil and silence over some silly noise maker.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kos-Mos (Post 1851188)
You don't quite get the point I guess.

Every operator wants less recoil and less noise signature.
However, until we invent portable laser weapons, it's not going to be the case.

Because of that, operators have to work hard and employ tactics suited to the tools available.

Now because airsoft guns don't have much recoil and barely makes any noise, basic stuff like FoF identification, steath approach, reconnaissance, target and line of fire evaluation and choice are not really relevant. By the time your target spots you, you had time to hose down lots of precise shots.

Having to cope with the fact that if you miss or miscalculate your position or the enemy's forces and movement changes EVERYTHING.

That comes from a guy playing GBBRs all summer. It does have a louder signature than any AEG, and at least a little recoil. Still, it's closed to a suppressed .22LR than a 5.56 supersonic round.

Having that kind of device on your gun would force you to adapt to a more realistic situation, with the benefit that you can use an AEG or ERG to add reliability and drop entry price.


pusangani December 1st, 2013 11:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mcbain500 (Post 1851390)
Because the guys I play with don't want it we are noobs.lol
You sir are a funny manchild.

Don't know who u play with, I can't speak about them, but from your uninformed statements I can tell you're a noob

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mcbain500 (Post 1851392)
Just a heads up none of us are operators.
I will take no recoil and silence over some silly noise maker.

Recoil and noise are realistic which is the whole point of Milsim, go play laser tag if you want silence and no recoil noob

SuperHog December 1st, 2013 11:30

I think CTW sounds better, but in a few years as it get perfected, it would be even more realistic.

C-BANGSâ„¢ - Fire and Sound Simulation Device for Airsoft - YouTube


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:36.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.