I wish they actually have real spec magazine IE the circular part stick out the bottom.

Wonder if the ejection port is actually present at the bottom or is it completely closed circuit.

If you think about it, having both is a big bonus! Especially if you really enjoy the feel of that particular weapon. Then you would basically have your cold weather p90, and a warm weather p90.

Only downside that I find is, once you switch over to a GBBR, its very difficult to come back to an AEG. For me personally, airsoft guns just don't have very much appeal now, unless they go bang!

I'm hoping for a mk43 mod 0

That's true, but I don't foresee myself having issues with switching between the two considering I look at AEGs or GBBRs as tools of the trade. Either way I'll use them to get the job done plus having fun doing it. Does anyone know the Round count on the Gas mags by any chance?

+1 buddy, I was shocked and horrified to have a G36 confused with a support gun.

What do you mean, exactly?

awesome! I want one!

get in line.

Very interesting! I didn't think anyone would move on to make a P90 GBBR so soon. That recoil was disappointing as hell though...

that is why its a prototype, they will iron the kinks out, maybe you should email them your ideas to put in it...
dream has came true... and at the same time having a deja vu about a GBB p90

I'm not sure if any of you have seen a real P90 fired... those things don't have much of a kick to them either..

YouTube - P-90 Demo

YouTube - P90 One Hand Shooting

I've had the opportunity to shoot the FS2000 which is chambered for 556. 556 altogether is a low recoil controllable round, but on the FS2000 the recoil is really exceptionally controllable. I assume that total momentum transfer is the same (I still believe in conservation of momentum), but the felt recoil is significantly softer than shooting an AR chambered for the same round. It seems that the gun is very well sprung for the 556 so you get a more persistent push, with less crack when shooting. The compensator is very well tuned, which results in very little if any muzzle rise.

I also suspect that the low barrel axis of the P90 contributes in it's comparably low muzzle rise. If you look at an AR, the barrel axis is coaxial with the stock tube which is at the top of the shoulder pad, perhaps centred 1/5th from the top of the pad. On the P90, the barrel axis is about 1/3 from the top of the shoulder pad. The lower barrel axis on the P90 would reduce the torque applied while firing which would reduce muzzle climb.

If the shoulder was centred on the stock pad then the barrel axis would be about 1/6th above the shoulder centre on the P90 whereas on the M4 you'd be about 3/10ths from the barrel axis. If both rifles shot the same projectile at the same muzzle velocity, you'd see 1.8x more momentum related climb per shot if both rifles had the same height stock pad.

Now the tradeoff I see between arrangements (beyond mag location) is that it puts the sighting line higher from the barrel axis which means you have to expose more of your head when you shoot over barriers. You also get less stance between front and rear iron sights on the P90 because there isn't much barrel sticking forwards. The stance on a P90 iron sight is pretty short, not much longer than on a pistol. Still, they're well placed. I was easily plugging doubletaps at 100yd on a 1' steel plate. A bayonet might not work so well on a P90. All things being equal (we're both out of ammo) I'd rather charge with a bayonet on an M4 than on a P90 :)

wow,that nude dude is really erotic!~~

wtf?

lol. a little off topic huh.